Exam Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Topic 3 Question 170 Discussion
Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect exam
Question #: 170
Topic #: 3
Question #: 170
Topic #: 3
Universal Containers has just completed several projects, including new custom objects and custom fields.
Administrators are having difficulty maintaining the application due to not knowing how objects and fields are being used. Which two options should an Architect recommend? Choose 2 answers
Administrators are having difficulty maintaining the application due to not knowing how objects and fields are being used. Which two options should an Architect recommend? Choose 2 answers
Suggested Answer: A,E Vote an answer
Explanation
Creating design standards to require help text on all custom fields and custom objects is an option that an Architect should recommend, as it helps to provide context and guidance for the administrators and users on how the fields and objects are used and what they mean. Creating design standards to consistently use the description field on custom fields is also an option that an Architect should recommend, as it helps to document the purpose and function of the fields and make them easier to maintain and understand. Creating design standards to consistently use the description field on custom objects is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it is not a mandatory field and may not provide enough information for the administrators. Creating design standards with a document to store all custom objects and custom fields is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it may be difficult to keep the document updated and synchronized with the actual metadata in the org. Creating design standards to require all custom fields on all custom object page layouts is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it may clutter the user interface and reduce the usability and performance of the application.
Creating design standards to require help text on all custom fields and custom objects is an option that an Architect should recommend, as it helps to provide context and guidance for the administrators and users on how the fields and objects are used and what they mean. Creating design standards to consistently use the description field on custom fields is also an option that an Architect should recommend, as it helps to document the purpose and function of the fields and make them easier to maintain and understand. Creating design standards to consistently use the description field on custom objects is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it is not a mandatory field and may not provide enough information for the administrators. Creating design standards with a document to store all custom objects and custom fields is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it may be difficult to keep the document updated and synchronized with the actual metadata in the org. Creating design standards to require all custom fields on all custom object page layouts is not an option that an Architect should recommend, as it may clutter the user interface and reduce the usability and performance of the application.
by maxlupu at Nov 27, 2023, 03:38 PM
Contact Us
If you have any question please leave me your email address, we will reply and send email to you in 12 hours.
Our Working Time: ( GMT 0:00-15:00 ) From Monday to Saturday
Support: Contact now
Comments
maxlupu
2023-11-27 15:38:53Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).